Contingency drawdown
Track P50 and P80 against actual spend and consumed float period-on-period, on the same audit chain as the run that set them.
Product
What Risk Studio includes — and what it does not.
Each module below shows its current availability. The status page carries the full evidence picture.
QSRAAvailable
Quantitative Schedule Risk
Four-framework validation, Schedule Lens diagnostics and traceable quantitative cross-checks under agreed controls.
Read the specLENSAvailable
Schedule Lens
Time-scaled Gantt with hierarchical WBS, critical path, milestones, open ends, dangling outlines, click-to-drill diagnostic trace.
See it moveQCRASupervised evaluation
Quantitative Cost Risk
Cost risk register and internal quantitative modelling for supervised evaluation only. Formal validation remains open.
Module detailQSCRANot offered
Combined Schedule + Cost
Combined schedule and cost risk modelling is not currently offered.
Read the boundary+Research
Tell us what's slowing you down
Future capability is shaped through governed practitioner evaluation. Bring a friction point or assurance check you need to examine.
Start the conversationWalkthrough
Reference data in. Traceable draft out.
The controlled workflow end to end — every frame below uses approved reference data, never client content.
- Step 01 · Inputs
Bring the schedule in, however it arrives.
Manual entry, paste‑in, standard template or non‑standard importer — four lanes onto the same schedule, with the source row kept beside every value.
- Step 02 · Validate
Four frameworks, every failure traced.
SOMA QSRA Readiness, DCMA 14‑point, CIOB PP21 and Acumen Fuse SQI run together. Each finding explains why — and points to the exact row, column or activity.
- Step 03 · Model
Internal Monte Carlo as cross‑check evidence.
Higham PSD repair, NORTA and six distributions produce S‑curves and Spearman tornados — deterministic cross‑check evidence for supervised review.
- Step 04 · Deliver
Draft outputs for supervised review.
Excel, Weblink HTML, PDF and PPTX drafts carry the same audit chain as the run that produced them — reviewed by a person before anything leaves the building.
How it fits together
One toolkit, four deliverables, one source of truth.
| Lane | Module | Status | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule risk modelling | QSRA | Available | Works alongside the approved engine of record |
| Visual schedule diagnostics | Schedule Lens | Available | Fictional reference demonstration |
| Cost risk modelling | QCRA | Supervised evaluation | Formal validation open |
| Combined schedule + cost | QSCRA | Not offered | Outside current scope |
No roadmap date or release promise is currently authorised.
Across the modules
Capabilities that travel with every scheme.
Portfolio and programme aggregation
Certified portfolio aggregation across schemes under an independence assumption; inter-scheme dependencies are not modelled, so the roll-up is cross-check evidence only.
Register hub
One governed hub for risks and assumptions, with mandatory provenance on every row and register lifecycle states from draft through to accepted.
Absolute-days duration uncertainty
A workshop mode that captures duration uncertainty in absolute days rather than percentages, so estimators work in the units they defend.
What's next. We publish the directions we are designing next — nothing is claimed until it is evidenced. See what's being designed next →
See Risk Studio working with reference data.
We'll walk through the capability and its current limits using approved reference data — no client files needed.